Movie Review – Columbus (San Diego Asian Film Festival 2017)

Columbus 07

EXPECTATIONS: A beautiful and fully-realized character piece.

REVIEW: In my many reviews about romance films and dramas, it may be fair to assume that I’m not really a fan of either genres, but the truth is I am a fan of those, especially with projects like the Before films by Richard Linklater, the many filial dramas of Hirokazu Koreeda, the down-to-earth films by Isao Takahata and so on.

The main ingredient that is needed for such films is the human connection. We need to have something at least plausible to cling on to, which can help us relate to the characters. Even in stories that revolve around something that very little have foreknowledge on, (like in the case of the film up for review: architecture), that connection is essential in succeeding as a compelling drama. Does Columbus succeed in that regard?

columbus2

The film starts off with a renowned architecture scholar going on with his day, examining and ruminating the buildings in tow. But suddenly, he falls ill and Eleanor (Parker Posey), his assistant, contacts the scholar’s son, Jin (John Cho) to come visit him in Columbus, Indiana, which is famous for its modernist buildings.

While being stuck between a building and a hard man, he comes across Casey (Haley Lu Richardson), a library worker and architecture enthusiast who dreams of leaving Columbus to pursue her dreams, but feels she is held back due to her troubled, but loving mother (Michelle Forbes). Together, they explore the many buildings in the town as well as themselves, becoming more intimate as they go along.

Columbus

If there’s one thing to say about this film, it’s that it is very soft-spoken. Visually recalling the work of Yasujiro Ozu, who has made films like Tokyo Story and An Autumn Afternoon, which are contemplative and deal with relationships, director Kogonada uses architecture as a backdrop, which lends to some beautiful scenery, captured crisply by cinematographer Elisha Christian.

The architecture in the film is basically shown as a group of characters themselves. Small actions from the characters like smoking a cigarette or taking a phone call are amplified due to the architecture design, like an iron fence, but throughout the film, the architecture might not also separate them, but could also bring them together.

Kogonada, who also wrote and edited the film, clearly has an ear for conveying human interactions on-screen, recalling films like Lost in Translation and Richard Linklater’s Before Trilogy. None of the dialogue sounds fake and the editing is minimal, which lends an easy leeway for the audience to empathize with the characters as well as feeling like voyeurs, listening to their interactions.

Even in emotional crescendos, Kogonada dials back by showing the characters at a distance or in one scene, dialing the music down to the point where we can only hear the character’s turmoil through sound, not dialogue. In other words, his characters converse and are portrayed like real people. But are they portrayed well enough by the actors?

0b9j1u0-seh50bul3y1pkul9jule

John Cho is basically an acting veteran, who is famous for being in the recent Star Trek films, the Harold and Kumar films and recently, a recurring role in The Exorcist TV series. Here, he has never been given a solid chance to play a leading man and he does a great job as Jin, conveying the character’s conflicting moods of expectations, regret and anger convincingly, with warmth and understanding. In one scene in particular, he basically role-plays his father. A cinematic trope that has been in many films, even in wuxia films where one would dress up like the one they love, sometimes love involves imitation and Cho nails it.

Parker Posey, who usually plays perky and slightly unhinged characters (in a comical fashion) is surprisingly and likably down-to-earth as Eleanor, while Rory Culkin lends good support as the friend of Casey.

But the real stand-out is Haley Lu Richardson. Showing promise in supporting roles of films like The Edge of Seventeen and Split, the newcomer proves herself to be a wonderful actress playing the role of Casey. With her character basically growing roots in her hometown, convincing herself that she’s fine the way she is, Richardson has to convey the many emotions brimming in Casey and she does it soulfully and gracefully.

Cho and Richardson share palpable chemistry together that it almost feels immediate as soon as they first meet. But the real wonder of the film is the gradual foundation of their relationship. Just as how they view the architecture, they view each other basically from face value but they never really say how the feel. But throughout the film, their feelings become more prominent and it explodes off the screen better than any pyrotechnic could.

Overall, Columbus is a fantastic directorial debut for Kogonada and a great showcase for its two leads, John Cho and Haley Lu Richardson. It is said that that with any building or relationship, a good solid foundation is needed and in the case of Columbus, it is a beautiful foundation indeed.

Columbus-Still-3

Quickie Review

PROS

Fantastic performances from its two leads

Palpable chemistry

Beautiful cinematography by Elisha Christian

Assured direction from Kogonada, retaining the human connection sorely lacking in films

CONS

May be too slow and covert with its intentions

SCORE: 9/10

Cast: John Cho, Haley Lu Richardson, Parkey Posey, Rory Culkin, Michelle Forbes
Director: Kogonada
Screenwriters: Kogonada

 

 

Advertisements

Movie Review – Blade of the Immortal

Blade-of-the-Immortal-UK-quad

EXPECTATIONS: Slice-and-dice, blood-and-gore, limbs-flying fun.

REVIEW: Takashi Miike, back in the V-cinema (straight-to-video) era, was a complete madman. Not in a human state (or maybe he is, who the hell knows?), but in his creative state, the images and ideas he comes up with can only come from a man who is completely bonkers.

This is the man who directed a film which had to have barf bags in some of the cinema screenings (Audition). This is the man who filmed a TV episode for a horror anthology that had been banned for being too disturbing (Imprint in Masters of Horror). This is the man who filmed two giant animal robots having sex…in a children’s movie! (Yatterman) This is the man who filmed the most amazing cockfight ever seen on screen (The City of Lost Souls).

Okay, the last one is debatable but the point is, this is a man whose filmography cannot be seen without one thinking with befuddlement and interest. With a man who has made so many gonzo works (including Fudoh: The Next Generation, Audition, Gozu, Ichi the Killer, Visitor Q etc.), where does his 100th film to date, Blade of the Immortal rank in the gonzo meter?

BladeOfTheImmortal-Photo31-2000-2000-1125-1125-crop-fill

The film starts off with a ultraviolent prologue, shown in black-and-white, where we first witness Manji (Takuya Kimura), a skilled samurai who is caught between a rock and a hard place when his sister Machi (Hana Sugisaki) is captured by bandits.

Due to tragic circumstances, Manji goes into a fit of rage and slaughters all of the bandits, which leads him to be involuntarily treated by a mysterious nun, Yaobikuni (Yoko Yamamoto), who uses blood worms to magically realign his veins and tissues, cursing him with immortality.

In the present day, we follow the story Rin (also played by Hana Sugisaki), the daughter of Kendo master, Asano. One night, the swordsmen of Ikki-ryu school, led by Kagehisa Anotsu (Sota Fukushi) storm into her father’s dojo and slaughter all of the students as well as Asano, leaving Rin helpless.

Swearing vengeance, she is led by Yaobikuni to hire Manji as a yojimbo (bodyguard or protector). Although his first impression of leaves Manji more than just annoyed, her striking resemblance to his sister motivates him otherwise on an adventure that will surely leave blood, gore and limbs in its path.

BladeOfTheImmortal-Photo6-2000-2000-1125-1125-crop-fill

Does this film rank up with Miike’s best? Not really, but it is still wildly entertaining nonetheless due to Miike’s ability to still surprise and entertain with his vivid direction, an enthusiastic cast and ample source material that provides tons of fun opportunities to exploit on screen.

Based on a manga that spans across 20 years worth of volumes, screenwriter Tetsuya Oishi thankfully distills it to a plot that that involves many mano-a-mano duels, wrapped in a classic tale of revenge that is quite reminiscent of films like True Grit, Logan and unsurprisingly the cult-classic anime film, Ninja Scroll, due to its wide variety of bizarre adversaries the leads face.

With characters like the monk Eiku Shizuma (Ebizo Ichikawa), the prostitute Makie (Erika Toda), Anotsu’s nemesis, Shira (Hayato Ichihara) and many more, the actors have plenty of material and characterization to sink their teeth into and they make the most of it.

BladeOfTheImmortal-Photo1_KEY-2000-2000-1125-1125-crop-fill

Takuya Kimura does well as Manji, as he conveys the world-weariness of his character convincingly and is capable of handling his action scenes well. The extensive facial makeup certainly helps with his performance, obscuring his baby-faced appearance.

Hana Sugisaki, who is incredibly talented for such a young age, thanks to films like Pieta in the Toilet and Her Love Boils Bathwater, doesn’t have a role that is as solid as in those films, but she displays much-needed verve and spirit into the part of Rin, that she makes her strong-willed character more substantial more than the script allows, especially when her character is written that she is threatened with assault many times throughout the film.

The supporting cast, which include many of Miike alums like Min Tanaka, Tsutomu Yamazaki, Kazuki Kitamura, Chiaki Kuriyama, Shinnosuke Mitsushima, Ken Kaneko are all great in their various scene-chewing parts, but the standouts are Sota Fukushi, Erika Toda and Hayato Ichihara.

BladeOfTheImmortal-Photo22-2000-2000-1125-1125-crop-fill

Erika Toda, who has gone a long way from her cutesy performances in her early days, is both surprisingly sympathetic and enjoyably campy as Makie, a bipolar killing machine of a prostitute, who often sheds tears of remorse of her actions and even the sight of blood.

Hayato Ichihara, whose acting method can be as hammy as Netflix’s Okja, is put to great use as the unhinged and unruly Shira while Ebizo Ichikawa is compelling as the eerily understated monk Eiku Shizuma, who actually has a surprising character reveal that adds to the story and has a sadistically funny fight scene with Kimura.

And of course there’s Sota Fukushi as Kagehisa Anotsu, the main antagonist. Unlike the entertainingly over-the-top caricatures, Fukushi plays his character with a moral conscience that is very effective and makes Anotsu more than just a one-dimensional villain, that we can actually empathize with him.

BladeOfTheImmortal-Photo5-2000-2000-1125-1125-crop-fill

With that much adversaries, that’s a hell of a lot of fights to witness. Fortunately, the fight scenes differ just enough from each other in various ways to avoid tedium, thanks to Keiji Tsuji and Masayoshi Deguchi‘s stuntwork.

While it may not be as garish as the fight choreography in the Rurouni Kenshin films or as cartoonish like Miike’s prior work (although it has plenty of gallows humour), it compensates for its more graphic and overstated approach to violence with copious amounts of stabbing, slicing, dicing, impaling and other ways that no human should ever go through.

And all of this is captured to its full-bore glory thanks to regular cinematographer Nobuyasu Kita, who pulls back so we can witness the many mutilated corpses. It certainly helps that the source material hints supernatural elements that allow Miike to break chanbara (Japanese term for “sword fighting”) conventions. Special credit must go to Akira Sakamoto, who is credited as the special weapons master and the props he comes up with on-screen are delightfully insane.

As for its flaws, like all of Miike’s recent work, the 150 minute runtime could use some trimming, but with the amount of characters on display and the simple yet dense plot that has many interesting threads (like a political conspiracy and double-crossings between kendo schools), it’s hard to be bored by it all.

Overall, Blade of the Immortal is a wildly entertaining entry from Takashi Miike that proves that he can put his stamp on terms such as “excess” and “overkill” and with a fantastic cast, crazy fight scenes, an engaging if overlong plot and gonzo characters, you’ll get red on you but you won’t give a damn, if it’s this much fun.

BladeOfTheImmortal-Photo4-2000-2000-1125-1125-crop-fill

Quickie Review

PROS

Great cast

Bizarre characters

Assured and unhinged direction from Miike

Great fight scenes

CONS

Overlong running time

Some script problems

SCORE: 8/10

lhs

This review can be also seen at THE IRIS. Visit the site by pressing the picture above.

Cast: Takuya Kimura, Hana Sugisaki, Sota Fukushi, Ebizo Ichikawa, Hayato Ichihara, Erika Toda, Min Tanaka, Tsutomu Yamazaki, Kazuki Kitamura, Chiaki Kuriyama, Shinnosuke Mitsushima, Ken Kaneko, Yoko Yamamoto
Director: Takashi Miike
Screenwriters: Tetsuya Oishi, based on the manga by Hiroaki Samura

Movie Review – Claire’s Camera (San Diego Asian Film Festival 2017)

claires-camera-poster

EXPECTATIONS: Not sure, to be honest.

REVIEW: The work of Korean director Hong Sang-soo is, unfortunately, a blind spot of mine that I desperately need to rectify. The only film of his I have seen is In Another Country, which starred Isabelle Huppert and was a charming, frothy comedy about the amusing failings of human behaviour.

So when I heard that director Hong was reuniting with Huppert on their second film on another frothy, fluffy light comedy with Korean actress Kim Min-hee (fresh off her critically acclaimed performance from Hong’s last film, On the Beach at Night Alone), despite my lack of knowledge of Hong’s work, I had to say yes. Does the film live up to the director’s sterling reputation and entice me to discover more of his prior work?

15435729002clairescstill

Kim Min-hee stars as Man-hee, a film sales assistant who, in a very amusingly dry scene, is suddenly fired by her boss Yang-hye (Chang Mi-hee) for reasons unknown, except for the fact that she is dishonest. And all of this happens in the smack-dab middle of the Cannes Film Festival.

Left adrift in a beach (where else?), she meets Claire (Isabelle Huppert), a Parisian teacher who is in town to support her friend’s film. Unbeknownst to Man-hee, Claire happens to know Yang-hye as well as director So Wan-soo (Jung Jin-young) by taking pictures of them with her Instamatic in a serendipitous fashion.

clairescamera_finecut-h_2017

To reiterate again, I’m a neophyte of the work of Hong Sang-soo and in the case of his film, Claire’s Camera, not much of a plot or even an actual event happens at all here. So, why did I have the biggest smile on my face from beginning to end? Basically down to two reasons.

Firstly, it’s the charisma of the actors involved. Seeing actresses Kim Min-hee and Isabelle Huppert free and unburdened from their emotionally draining performances from On the Beach at Night Alone and Elle, the two look like they’ve having the time of their lives, just appearing in a film and being naturalistic as possible.

Isabelle Huppert, who’s probably never given a bad performance, does very well as Claire, who she convincingly conveys a mysterious allure that makes the other characters very receptive towards her. Her artistry with her Instamatic and her backstory drives her to never take the sights and sounds of life for granted.

Kim Min-hee can convey joy and vulnerability in a matter of seconds and she does very well as Man-hee, especially in the scene where she finds out that she’s fired, delivering lines like “Let’s take a photo of us to commemorate my firing” in an amusingly dry way.

claires-camera

Secondly, the interactions between the characters. Knowing Man-hee’s backstory (including the reason of her firing as well as a sexist backlash) her interactions with her Korean co-stars (like the dryly amusing Chang Mi-hee and the loutish Jung Jin-young), as well as between the co-stars themselves are always blunt but still somehow passive in their emotions.

Whereas her interactions with her and Claire, although they are not speaking in their native tongues, it becomes clear that they always say what they mean and adds a sense of intimacy and closeness. It also helps that their interactions (in English) are amusing and likable to the point that you can believe that they can actually become soulmates, thanks to their tangible chemistry.

And even for devotees for Hong Sang-soo, there are plenty of references to his previous work (the most blatant being a movie poster of his) or even his private life involving Kim Min-hee on (Jung Jin-young, being an obvious doppelganger of Hong himself).

Overall, Claire’s Camera is the cinematic equivalent of milk ice tea. It doesn’t really add up to much substantially. But it’s sweet, looks nice, goes down smooth and if the drink it’s made really well, it might end up being quite the memorable thing.

Quickie Review

PROS

Fantastic leads

Amusingly dry and improvised sense of humour

Has a substantial sense of intimacy between the characters

CONS

Not much of a plot or story or deeper meaning

SCORE: 7/10

Cast: Isabelle Huppert, Kim Min-hee, Chang Mi-hee, Jung Jin-young, Shahira Fahmy
Director: Hong Sang-soo
Screenwriters: Hong Sang-soo

 

Movie Review – Professor Marston and the Wonder Women

0000000006

EXPECTATIONS: Something wonderful.

REVIEW: Biopics these days are a hard genre to execute due to the fact that whenever actors star in them, it just gives off a vibe that he, she or they are acting for awards. Like the formula for Oscar Bait is to talk in a funny accent or shout. To truly nail a true character, there’s more to it than just imitation.

Bad examples of biopics include films like Patch Adams, Diana and yes, even A Beautiful Mind fail to succeed from a filmmaking standpoint (due to sappy music, biopic cliches, lacking in exploration of the spirit of the subject etc.) and have performances that come off as a collection of tics, rather than a true embodiment of the subject that they are playing.

With great biopics like Walk the Line, Nixon and I’m Not There, these are films that capture the spirit of the real-life subjects with the combination of fantastic performances that inhabit the subject and stellar filmmaking that does more than just recount a series of events.

So when I went into seeing Professor Marston and the Wonder Women and all I knew about the film was that it involved the creation of the popular female superhero, Wonder Woman. What I didn’t know about the film until I saw it was something that led me to think this is one of the best movies of the year.

PROFESSOR MARSTON AND THE WONDER WOMEN

Luke Evans plays Professor William Marston, a famed college teacher and psychologist who is in the middle of creating an invention that would go on to be the lie detector. Collaborating with his wife, Elizabeth Marston (Rebecca Hall), who is also a teacher, they become stuck in the way of progress and decide to hire a college student to help get them out of their creative slump. Their search for the perfect aide leads them to Olive Byrne (Bella Heathcote).

Little do they know is their solid relationship that they will forge together will not only lead to the creation of the first female superhero but also a relationship that shows love knows no bounds.

la-ca-mn-sneaks-professor-marston-20170903

Once again, I had no clue of what the film was truly about, even when I saw the final trailer, which thankfully doesn’t spoil any of the moments. But this is a story that is about sexuality, dominance, submission, femininity, poly-amorous relationships and how they were treated and of course, the creation of Wonder Woman and the rapturous reactions it got from people.

With Angela Robinson‘s assured direction and screenwriting, she gamely handles all of the themes above with integrity and sincerity, easily resonating with the audience. Even the sexuality is handled tastefully, but never to the point of either being exploitative or lacking in passion.

Even in scenes of sexual discovery, character epiphanies and empowerment eg. when Olive wears what would end up being a prototype of the Wonder Woman costume, Robinson subverts expectations of that scene and it ends up being surprisingly tense, emotionally stirring and inspiring, rather than going along the lines of prurience.

PROFESSOR MARSTON AND THE WONDER WOMEN

But even with the direction and scripting of Robinson, none of the film’s emotional power would be as effective as it stands without the trio of stellar performances from the three talented leads, as well as their palpable chemistry.

Having seen Luke Evans last in the mediocre live-action adaptation of Beauty and the Beast, being miscast in the role of Gaston, I remember saying that he looked too smart to play a buffoon like that. In the case of Professor Marston, Evans pulls off the charisma, intelligence and passion of the character with gusto. Finally having a role on-screen that is worthy of his talents, Evans is an actor that will be following steadfastly from now on.

In the case of fellow Australian actress Bella Heathcote, she has given some good performances in films like The Neon Demon (where she is more like cyborg than human) and The Rewrite (where she charms and delights with maturity). In the case of Olive Byrne, Heathcote makes the progression of her character from timidness to empowerment play out in a convincing fashion that it makes the scene where she dons the prototype outfit of Wonder Woman that much more powerful.

But the best out of the three leads is Rebecca Hall. To think that she already peaked with her underseen performance in Christine, Hall gives a fantastic performance as Elizabeth Marston, conveying her tenacity, her quick wit and especially her vulnerability so brilliantly, it’s no wonder that Professor Marston would fall for such a fascinating woman.

And the chemistry the three share is compelling, making it incredibly easy for the audience to root for them. Even when Robinson edges over the line of overusing the musical score by Tom Howe, it never annoys when these characters are so wonderfully human and engaging. So much so that it makes the story about the creation of Wonder Woman look inferior by comparison, which by the way, did make me look at the female superhero in a different light after I left the cinema.

professorm-teaser1-1500389843

As for its flaws, aside from the slight overuse of the musical score, the film does suffer a bit from creative licensing due to some questionable events that may seem a bit too phony to be true, but in retrospect, it’s not that much of a flaw due to the fact that the film works because of the creative licensing.

For example, the Oliver Stone film JFK took major liberties with the events of history, but that never stopped it from being a great film. So why would such creative licensing stop Professor Marston and the Wonder Women from being a great film?

In either case, Professor Marston and the Wonder Women succeeds as a poly-amorous love story, a fascinating biopic, a compelling view on the creation of Wonder Woman and as a showcase for Luke Evans, Rebecca Hall and Bella Heathcote.

Over the times, I usually say I love a film when I enjoyed it immensely, but Professor Marston and the Wonder Women is the first film in 2017 that I fell in love with. Don’t let it fall into obscurity and go see it as soon as you can.

Quickie Review

PROS

Fantastic performances/chemistry between the three leads

Angela Robinson’s assured direction and scripting rises above biopic cliches

CONS

Slight overuse of the musical score

Creative liberties may irk some

SCORE: 9.5/10

lhs

This review can be also seen at THE IRIS. Visit the site by pressing the picture above.

Cast: Luke Evans, Rebecca Hall, Bella Heathcote, Connie Britton, Monica Giordano, JJ Feild, Chris Conroy, Alexia Havins, Oliver Platt
Director: Angela Robinson
Screenwriters: Angela Robinson

Movie Review – Bad Moms 2 (aka A Bad Moms Christmas)

QUAD_vis_REV[6][2]

EXPECTATIONS: Something approaching the entertaining quality of the original.

REVIEW: Ahh yes, the cinematic comedy sequel. These past several years, we have gotten many sequels to comedies, whether they were made by popular demand, the means of nostalgia or the fact that Hollywood has been running out of ideas.

Although we have some gems like 22 Jump Street, the Kung Fu Panda films, Men In Black 3, Scream 4 and others, which are at least good in their own terms, we also have very bad examples like Zoolander 2, Dumb and Dumber To, Cars 2, The Hangover Part II and others, which were either tired retreads, misunderstandings of what made the originals cherished or just awful on all factors.

So when I went into Bad Moms 2 (aka A Bad Moms Christmas), I went in with an open mind. All the factors that made the original enjoyable are back but I wanted something a little bit more than just a retread. Something inspired that would bring the film to another level. Does the sequel manage to do that?

maxresdefault

Under-appreciated and overburdened moms Amy (Mila Kunis), Kiki (Kristen Bell) and Carla (Kathryn Hahn) are back and they all have their families under control: loved and tended for. But there’s one thing that happens every year that they dread: the festive spirit of Christmas.

As if creating the perfect holiday for their families isn’t hard enough, they’ll have to do it while hosting and entertaining their own respective mothers (Christine Baranski, Cheryl Hines and Susan Sarandon) when they come to visit. Time to get the Christmas spirit…from the liquor bottle!

rs-a-bad-moms-christmas-159fa9d4-c513-47bc-90a8-9159114134d5

Now I have to admit, in the first 10-15 minutes of the film, it was beginning to look a hell of a lot like a retread of the first Bad Moms. It was still amusing stuff and the cast haven’t lost a beat, which isn’t a surprise since the last film came out just last year.

Hell, in retrospect, all of the positives and negatives of the first film are replicated here, whether its the talented cast, the mega-happy conclusion, the overuse of slow-motion montages and the cartoonish execution undermining the film’s thematic potential. I could have easily just copied and pasted my review of the original film and that would be the end of it.

But there is one thing that makes this sequel a good continuation of the original: the new supporting characters played by Christine Baranski, Cheryl Hines and Susan Sarandon. Such inspired casting would be either underused or ill-advised, but writer-directors Jon Lucas and Scott Moore realize their comedic potential.

By giving them ample screen-time (separately as well as together as an ensemble), the actresses end up stealing the show from the leads. And despite the exaggerated portrayals, Lucas and Moore give them enough emotional grounding to see where the characters are coming from, that people can relate to.

mila-kunis

Hines nails the delicateness, the clinginess of her character perfectly while Sarandon is great as the unruly mother of Carla, who’s either buzzed from drugs, alcohol or something else we might not want to know.

But the real stand-out is Baranski, who perfects the ice queen stereotype as if she made the damn thing. Having enjoyed her work since The Birdcage and Bowfinger, she effortlessly nails questionable material (either racial or cliched) just from her delivery alone.

And of course in a Bad Moms sequel, there’s a new flirtation device. Basically taking over the role from Jay Hernandez (who now plays the punching bag of Baranski’s character), Justin Hartley plays Ty, a fireman who’s also a stripper. Hartley is a great sport in the role and the interactions between him and Hahn are some of the funniest parts of the film, due to how sincere they play the scene out.

This is gonna be a shorter review than the norm, but one thing is for certain. If you liked the first Bad Moms film, then you’ll like Bad Moms 2. It’s just that simple. And while it could’ve been a tired retread, the additions of Christine Baranski, Cheryl Hines and Susan Sarandon kick the film back into high gear.

If there’s one spin-off with potential out there, it’s in this film.

MILA KUNIS, KRISTEN BELL, and KATHRYN HAHN in A BAD MOMS CHRISTMAS.

Quickie Review

PROS

Cast all give great performances

Themes are still relatable and have emotional grounding

CONS

Too many montages

Overlong and sappy ending

SCORE: 7/10

lhs

This review can be also seen at THE IRIS. Visit the site by pressing the picture above.

Cast: Mila Kunis, Kristen Bell, Kathryn Hahn, Christine Baranski, Cheryl Hines, Susan Sarandon, Jay Hernandez, Justin Hartley, Peter Gallagher, Oona Laurence, Emjay Anthony, David Walton, Wanda Sykes
Director: Jon Lucas, Scott Moore
Screenwriters: Jon Lucas, Scott Moore

Movie Review – Brigsby Bear

032320

EXPECTATIONS: A funny SNL debut entry into film.

REVIEW: When you hear a film that is green-lit and it is basically a vehicle for an SNL star, chances are that one would expect the film to be bad. Films like A Night at the Roxbury, Superstar and The Ladies Man are all garbage. Although some of them do gain a cult following over time like Hot Rod and MacGruber, there are also some that are genuinely funny like the Wayne’s World films, Mean Girls and others.

So when I heard that a SNL alumni was making his lead debut in a film about a magical bear in a television show, I have to admit, I wasn’t really looking forward to it. It certainly didn’t help that the lead actor, Kyle Mooney, appeared in Zoolander 2, a film that I loathed and he played the most annoying character. So annoying that I wished his character would die and **SPOILER ALERT for Zoolander 2** when he did, I literally stood up and cheered.

Speaking about my crippled state of mind, besides my initial reservations, it helps to have an open mind about film before going in because there are projects out there that have the potential to surprise you and I hoped Brigsby Bear would do the trick. Will the magic work on me or will the film struggle to reach the bare necessities?

6ec50dd87b158520bae99b5dcdea582f-2000-2000-1125-1125-crop-fill

Kyle Mooney stars as James, an imaginative young man, who only knows in this world are his mother and father (an amusing pair with Jane Adams and Mark Hamill), the walls of the underground bunker they live in and the many VHS teachings of Brigsby Bear, a folksy talking bear whose catchphrases include “curiosity is an unnatural emotion” and “trust only the familial unit”.

But when reality unexpectedly throws him out of whack, James has to face the real world; a world he cannot understand and a new family he doesn’t know. To make things worse, he finds out that Brigsby Bear doesn’t exist on the outside, so he takes it upon himself to finish the adventures of Brigsby Bear for good with a video camera in tow.

brigsby2

With themes like child kidnapping, fitting in the real world, loneliness, you would expect this film to be a full-bore drama, but in the case of Brigsby Bear, it is only part of it. The rest is quirky, whimsical and humourous. Now this may sound like the makings of a recipe of sick, but director Dave McCary and lead actor/screenwriter Kyle Mooney make Brigsby Bear an absurdly charming and heartwarming, if flawed piece of work.

The main reason the film truly works is Kyle Mooney. Having doubts over him, my reservations were washed away by his stellar work. He brings the perfect mix of childlike wonder, deadpan delivery and sincerity to the role that even when he says unwitting things like wishing his sister was abducted with him so they would’ve had fun together, it becomes pretty easy to laugh at him as well as alongside him.

brigsby-bear-sundance-2017-review.png

The fish-out-of-water scenarios that James goes through do provide ample laughs, particularly during a scene where he goes to a teenage party, where he mingles with the youth. The supporting cast all do good work with their roles like Ryan Simpkins as James’ sister, Mark Hamill as James’ father and Kate Lyn Sheil in a small role as an actress in the Brigsby Bear show.

In fact, one of the best scenes in the film involves Mooney and Sheil meeting up for the first time and the interactions between the two are both dramatically compelling and amusing. The mix of remorse and morose humour is executed perfectly, showing the film at its best.

11

But when the story progresses to the point when James starts filming the rest of Brigsby Bear, the film unfortunately becomes predictable to the point that it feels like its going through a laundry list of indie cliches such as the bonding scenes between the characters and even Greg Kinnear‘s character as the cop who secretly wants to be an actor; it just feels like tropes we’ve seen many times in indie films.

And the storytelling does suffer from some problems like how the two tones of seriousness and humour betray each other or worse, how the film never has as much conflicts and obstacles for James to go through. It makes the journey a little bit too easy in comparison to what James has on him as baggage, which is what makes the scene between Mooney and Sheil a relief from the predictability.

Brigsby-Bear-new-picture-2

Overall, the film is a good effort for actor/screenwriter Kyle Mooney and director Dave McCary and I hope they do better work in the future, as Brigsby Bear is a heartfelt, warm and peculiar piece of work that could have been great. But hey, a little magic is better than having no magic at all, right?

Quickie Review

PROS

Kyle Mooney gives a great performance

The supporting cast give life to their roles

Appropriate amounts of whimsy are well-executed, particularly in the first act

CONS

Crawls back to predictable indie cliches

Tonal shifts hinder the experience

Not much conflict for the lead character

SCORE: 7/10

lhs

This review can be also seen at THE IRIS. Visit the site by pressing the picture above.

Cast: Kyle Mooney, Jorge Lendeborg Jr., Matt Walsh, Michaela Watkins, Claire Danes, Ryan Simpkins, Greg Kinnear, Mark Hamill, Alexa Demie, Beck Bennett, Chance Crimin, Jane Adams, Kate Lyn Sheil, Andy Samberg
Director: Dave McCary
Screenwriters: Kevin Costello, Kyle Mooney

Movie Review – The Snowman

boneco-de-neve-michael-fassbender-691x1024

EXPECTATIONS: A film that is warmer than its frosty reputation.

REVIEW: Another week, another film set in the snowy terrain. This week, we have The Snowman, a serial killer thriller starring Michael Fassbender, Rebecca Ferguson and a embarrassment of talent. But unlike the prior film, The Mountain (of Cheese) Between Us, this film has achieved quite a negative reception and brutal reviews from almost every major publication. So what must one do if one were to go into a film like this?

It helps to have an open mind. Films in the past like The Shining (1980), Scarface (1983) and 2001: A Space Odyssey (not released in 2001) gained negative reviews in the past, but over time, the films have garnered a much more positive reception; so there is a chance that The Snowman may be an unappreciated gem.

It could also help that you watch the film with an ironic bent in mind. Laughter really is the best medicine, regardless of the intention and it can get one through films painlessly and even have give films a new reputation as a unintentional comedy classic eg. The Wicker Man (2006) and The Room.

And of course, there’s the much more unorthodox solution of going in a film while being inebriated from either mild amounts of alcohol and cough syrup, but that is not recommended. With all that in mind and all that negative baggage, is it possible to actually enjoy The Snowman for what it is? Let’s cool off and delve into this thing, Mr Freeze-style.

maxresdefault
What an ice-hole.

Michael Frost-bender stars as Harry Hole (no, really), an investigator who’s down on his luck due to his addictions and his zero-temperature status of a marriage with his ex-wife (Charlotte Gains-breeze).

He is then brought back into the fray where an elusive serial killer known as The Snowman starts killing again, continuing a streak of murdered women. With the help of a young, experienced recruit (Rebecca Frigid-son), Hole has to connect the streak of murders to the current murders to stop The Snowman from striking again.

fassbender-snowman
This is a man who can’t believe what he got himself into.

So with the alcohol/cough syrup discount, an open mind and an ironic bent in check, did I enjoy The Snowman? Absolutely not. But let’s not start this on the negative side. The cinematography by Ski-on Beebe (too many great films to mention) is terrific, as it conveys the chilling territory of the locations in Norway quite well. And the musical score by M-arctic-o Beltrami does deliver a sense of urgency (along the side of unintentionally hilarious timing) to the proceedings.

And like a sense of warmth in the winter, it’s gone in an instant and we delve into the negatives. With this much talent in the cast (Val Chill-mer, Snow-by Jones, J.K. Ski-mmons, Snowy Sevigny and others), you expect them to give passionate and heated performances that would at least elevate the script. Unfortunately, that never happens.

Almost all of the performances are so stilted and petrified that it’s almost as if they were all kept in a meat freezer for weeks and just as the cameras started to roll, they were finally let out to deliver their lines on cue. It’s awe-inspiring to think that this much talent is given next to nothing to work with and are left out there in the cold.

the-snowman-movie-rebecca-ferguson-
That’s the face of a woman who knows that she deserves better.

There’s a scene where Charlotte Gains-breeze and Michael Frost-bender are engaging in a prurient fashion that is so ill-executed that it brings new meaning to the word “frigid”. The only bright (or at least, easily seen) light out of the cast is Rebecca Frigid-son, who actually shows signs of life, until her character is unceremoniously expended.

Speaking of being unceremoniously expended, almost of the female characters are either damsels-in-distress, sex objects or murder victims. Hell, some of them are all three. To think at this day of age, the story could be updated to be timely and thematic but the film has the nerve to have a character that is eerily reminiscent of Harvey Windbag Weinstein (with an out-of-this-world accent).

Even with that in check, the story itself is just so dull and goes by at a glacial pace, the film makes polar ice caps look like cars in the Fast and Furious films. The killer himself (or is it herself?) is so predictable that the film should have featured a siren that goes “HONK! HONK!” when the person arrived. And the backstory and motive for the killer is even worse, which adds to the sexism directed to the female characters. It is the solid black foreshadowing, the many scenes of overdone exposition and the horrific editing (credited to Claire Ski-mpson and later credited to Thelma Snow-Cone-maker) that kills every source of heated tension.

le-bonhomme-de-neige-devoile-un-premier-trailer-glacant-avec-michael-fassbender-video-f8a4462ad782a5e702
That’s the face of a man who just woke up and realized what film he is in.

But let’s give special mention to Val Chill-mer. Featuring in the film via flashbacks, he brings much-needed and unintentional vitality (or insanity) to the film that audiences will be shocked and awed at his appearance and especially the dubbing. While it is very understandable why Chill-mer was dubbed due to sounding like Sylvester Stallone on Quaaludes (NOTE: Here’s the proof!), the dubbing is so terrible that American distributors of Shaw Brothers films would be rolling on the floor laughing if they witnessed it.

Even if Chill-mer was dubbed properly, the script doesn’t help anyone involved whatsoever, since it is in desperate need of defrosting. According to an interview with director Snow-mas Alfredson, he said that only 85% of the script was completed. If that’s true, then the film is more nourished than I thought since the trailer actually has many scenes foreshadowed that are not in the finished product.

Dialogue exchanges border on farce like in a scene where Hole asks a colleague for some files that you’ll be begging for icicles to pierce your ears with; film techniques such as cutaways and dramatic zooms are utilized to laughable effect (every time a snowman appears) and the violence is so overstated, that it comes across as funny (like scenes from M Fright. Shyamalan‘s The Happening). Hell, even the narrations (which in one particular scene is via walkie-talkie) is embarrassing to witness.

How could this much talent involved could make such a disastrous film? To be honest, it doesn’t matter what the answer is. Even with Val Chill-mer‘s appearance and Snow-mas Alfredson‘s explanation, it doesn’t matter what happened behind the scenes; what matters is what’s on-screen. And after witnessing this disaster, someone out there is just begging to get their ice kicked.

But hey, snow film is better than no film, right? WRONG!

68526692
That’s the face of a man who’s career is steadily going down the toilet.

Quickie Review

PROS

Good cinematography and effective score

Rebecca Frigid-son

CONS

Everything else

SCORE: 1/10

lhs

This review can be also seen at THE IRIS. Visit the site by pressing the picture above.

Cast: Michael Fassbender, Rebecca Ferguson, Charlotte Gainsbourg, Jonas Karlsson, J.K. Simmons, Val Kilmer, David Dencik, Toby Jones, Chloe Sevigny, James D’Arcy
Director: Tomas Alfredson
Screenwriters: Hossein Amini, Peter Straughan, Søren Sveistrup

Movie Review – The Mountain Between Us

__59d818982defe

EXPECTATIONS: Simple yet romantic survival story.

REVIEW:

WARNING: This review may contain heavy traces of cheese.

Before I start off this review, let me just make this one thing clear. I do like romantic films. This year alone, we have great films like Their Finest, The Big Sick, Our God’s Country and Call Me By Your Name. As much as I cannot stand overstated, implausible films of its ilk, I do understand why people do like them. It’s a fantasy and if there’s an audience for overstated, implausible action films, why can’t we have an audience for the former?

In the case of my expectations of The Mountain Between Us, they were kept in moderation. Having a romance set in a survival story is nothing new; especially when Kate Winslet is in one of the most popular films ever made about that, but it does lend a different twist to the genre and with director Hana Abal-Assad, Kate Winslet and Idris Elba on-board, it could be a worthwhile trip.

But the last romantic film I’ve seen with Winslet was the excremental Labor Day, a film so borderline moronic and illogical that it made me squeamish every time I looked at pies. But The Mountain Between Us can’t be as bad as that. Can it?

tmbu-gallery-01-gallery-image

The film starts off with Alex (Kate Winslet), a headstrong and reckless photojournalist who is rushing at the airport, struggling to get back to her fiance (human wardrobe Dermot Mulroney) on time for her wedding day. There she meets Ben (Idris Elba), a cautious, methodical surgeon who needs to get back home in time to initiate an emergency operation for a 10-year old boy.

Noticing the similar predicaments, Alex devises a solution and invites Ben to board a charter plane, with Walter (Beau Bridges) as the pilot and his pet dog as the co-pilot. As they are on the way home, the plane crashes in remote, snowy terrain. Having very little supplies and even less chance of help arriving, the two go on a perilous journey for survival, along with something more.

tmbu-gallery-06-gallery-image

Like preparing for a perilous journey, let’s start with the positives. The cinematography by fellow Australian Mandy Walker (who’s worked on a similar survival story Tracks, among others) is terrific. The million miles of pure-ass nature (a line in the film, believe it or not) are captured beautifully and makes it easy to believe that it would be a torture for anyone to trek through. Speaking of torture, the plane crash itself is very well-executed, as the editing is seamless as well as the special effects employed.

And like embracing death during the perilous journey, we get to the negatives, and there’s a mountain-load of them. The biggest one is the incredibly problematic and frankly cheesy script by Chris Weitz and J. Mills Goodloe. The willing suspension of disbelief was shaken as soon as I heard Beau Bridges‘ voice as Walter. No one in their right mind would believe that he would be in good health to fly a plane. And the fact that he didn’t devise a flight-plan beforehand was just a honking siren for danger. But wait, there’s more!

tmbu-gallery-07-gallery-image

How does the dog keep surviving the long journey through the snow without as much as an iota of frostbite? How does Alex’s leg lose swelling through the ice-cold journey? And what about Ben’s leg cut that bears no ill will to him whatsoever? And the list of unbelievable moments goes on and on and on. It’s almost as if the writers sprinkled Parmesan cheese all over it.

Speaking of unbelievable (and cheese), the dialogue is so laughable and out of this world that it would make the staff at Hallmark fall on the floor, laughing hysterically. With zingers like “I feel alive!”, “I need to occupy my amygdala” and “What about the heart?”, the film makes it head-bangingly obvious that the characters are different from each other. There’s even a moment where a recorder is used to communicate to the audience that Ben likes being in control.

And then there’s the cast. Despite the arctic setting, the only thing in the film that’s frozen is the chemistry between the two leads. They have absolutely no heat or believable passion that not even the cheese in the film can melt the ice. And what’s worse is that the transition from survival story to romantic tale is so mechanical that you can actually pinpoint the starting position where the romance starts (Minor spoiler: it’s when Alex pushes Ben to the ground).

Speaking of mechanical, the moments of tension and thrills in the film feel like they were just bolted in just in case the film lost the attention of the audience. It doesn’t help that the characters never really feel like they’re in real mortal danger. A cliff fall here, a water dive there,  a mountain lion from behind; the only reason that the audience would feel any sympathy for the characters is because they’re played by Kate Winslet and Idris Elba.

tmbu-gallery-03-gallery-image

Winslet is really trying her best in a difficult role, but she only ends up being difficult and really trying. Elba lends presence and credibility to the character of Ben but he could only take it so far, as the incredibly sloppy script is concerned. Funnily enough, the press notes actually say that Ben is smart as he is handsome. That basically sums up the effort that went to the script.

But even after all of that, that’s just the cheese of the stuffed crust. The last 20 minutes of the film is where the story basically turns into a tidal wave of cheese that would have swarm upon swarm of rats running in the cinema to jump on the screen. In other words, the supposed romantic tension, the awful dialogue and quite possibly the funniest final shot of the year cap the film not as a romantic drama, but a romantic comedy.

And just hypothetically speaking of the former, if you were to choose between an actor that acts like a tree (Dermot Mulroney) or an actor that is basically built like a tree (Idris Elba), who would you choose? That basically sums up the level of romantic tension in the film.

And as much as the critically acclaimed director Assad and leads Winslet and Elba can do with their efforts, the only thing between them and the audience is a mountain of cheese. With the script on top.

Quickie Review

PROS

The film looks nice

Actors do what they can

CONS

Clumsy script

Cheesiness that permeates throughout the film

Last 20 minutes are almost laugh-out-loud funny

SCORE: 3/10

lhs

This review can be also seen at THE IRIS. Visit the site by pressing the picture above.

Cast: Kate Winslet, Idris Elba, Beau Bridges, Dermot Mulroney
Director: Hany Abu-Assad
Screenwriters: J. Mills Goodloe, Chris Weitz, based on the novel by Charles Martin

Movie Review – Flatliners (2017)

FLATLINERS-2017

EXPECTATIONS: A bland, uninspired remake.

REVIEW: When a film isn’t press-screened or has its review embargo lifted on the same day of release, you know that something isn’t up to snuff. And this is what is happening with the latest remake (although, in recent reports, it is claimed to be a sequel) of Flatliners.

But the film has assembled quite a line-up of talent. An good director, a talented cast, an experienced crew and a bonkers premise that could be well-utilized in this day of age. So will the film surprise and actually shows signs of life or will the film be dead on arrival?

MV5BMWU3N2RlMTItYWUxNy00ZWM2LTliMmUtZmViYTE5YzU2OGE1XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjUwNzk3NDc@._V1_

Five medical students, led by Courtney Holmes (Ellen Page) embark on a daring and dangerous experiment to discover if there is anything to be experienced beyond death. It is there where the group decides to trigger near-death experiences by stopping their hearts for short periods of time.

As each of them go through their experience, becoming more risky and impulsive, each must confront the sins from their past while facing the paranormal consequences of journeying to the other side.

I’m just gonna lay it down flat on the (operating?) table and say this remake is nothing as bad as the film release may imply, but there really isn’t much of anything to say that is praiseworthy or even worthy of anything.

The original 1990 film, directed by Joel Schumacher, had a goofy tone that varies between sincere and surreal that it becomes quite fun and thankfully for the most part, the remake actually keeps that tone in check, even within the confines of being released in 2017.

There are some scenes that are so out-of-place that you can’t help but laugh, even if in retrospect if the laugh was more out of embarrassment rather than actually being earned. An example is a scene in the film where one character has just been “flatlined” and he (or she) escapes the confines of his (or her) parentage to the point where he (or she) becomes fully committed in a night of prurience.

Although it retains the goofiness of the original, what it lacks is its inspired visuals. Say what you want about director Joel Schumacher but the man never slacks off in making his films look stylish with either characters with big hair, back-lit sets, nipples on suits, overstated colour schemes and energetic camera movement. But in the case of the remake, director Niels Arden Oplev does absolutely nothing to stand out from the crowd as he adopts a sleek, yet bland look that we’ve seen a hundred times over from many other films.

FlatlinersmovieEllenpageonTab5992

The cast, like the original, give fine performances and make the most out of the material. Ellen Page lends gravitas to her role and grounds the film; ditto for Diego Luna as Ray, the rational one of the group; Nina Dobrev is quite good as Marlo, who has feelings of inadequacy; Kiersey Clemons (who’s fantastic in Dope) is enjoyably moody as Sophia, who feels suffocated in the confines and expectations of her life and lastly James Norton, who makes his brash character quite likable.

Speaking of likable, there are a few changes in the film that was nice to see. One of them does make the film a bit more unoriginal but it lends a much-needed sense of threat, which lead to a minor shock (keyword: minor) that got me quite a bit. But the filmmaking at hand does its best (or worst?) to alleviate all of that with telegraphed scares and sloppy editing.

There’s one scene in the film where a character is being threatened and is stabbed with a knife in the hand. But in the very next scene, the character is fine and dandy (with a minor bandage on the hand) as if nothing had happened. Where’s the tension and payoff from that?

There really isn’t much more to say about the Flatliners remake except that it is a completely unnecessary, if not terrible piece of work. Nothing to get mourn about, but no evidence to witness that would be seen as true signs of life.

Flatliners-Movie

FLATLINERS-2017

Quickie Review

I can’t be bothered, to be honest.

SCORE: 4/10

lhs

This review can be also seen at THE IRIS. Visit the site by pressing the picture above.

Cast: Ellen Page, Diego Luna, Nina Dobrev, Kiersey Clemons, James Norton, Beau Mirchoff, Kiefer Sutherland
Director: Niels Arden Oplev
Screenwriters: Peter Filardi (original story), Ben Ripley

Movie Review – Pop Aye

19429301_153253978553252_8753071855222390784_n

EXPECTATIONS: A sweet, gentle buddy comedy/road trip film.

REVIEW: Although I am a fan of all film genres and tropes, the specific genre trope that I have an affinity for is the human-fantasy friendship trope. Whether it’s between a human and a horse (War Horse), a human and a robot (The Iron Giant), a human and a mutant super-pig (Okja) or a human and a Totoro (My Neighbour Totoro), a strong bond is a strong bond, no matter how bizarre the circumstances are.

In the case of Kirsten Tan‘s directorial debut, Pop Aye, it’s between a human and a elephant. Unlike Tony Jaa‘s action epic The Protector where the man kills billions of people to get his elephant back from mustache-twirling bad guys, the main lead in Pop Aye reunites with his eponymous childhood pet and tries to take him back to his village. Will the film be as touching as the prior examples or will the film need to be put down?

8D7A9325

Thaneth Warakulnukroh makes his acting debut as Thana, a middle-aged architect, who is bored at work as well as at home with his wife Bo (Penpak Sirikul). One day, as he wanders the Bangkok city, he spots an elephant which turns out to be his childhood pet, Pop Aye.

Faster than you can say “Don Quixote”, he buys Pop Aye and then decides to take the elephant back to the village where they grew up together and into his uncle Peak’s (Narong Pongpab) care. Thus, they embark on a road trip through the rural Thailand to their hometown of Loei Province, Isan.

Pop-Aye-e1485765130440

Okay, maybe the last statement in the introductory paragraph was a bit mean-spirited but there are many examples out there that are downright terrible like Marley and Me (which is as incorrect as the grammatical error of a title) and the recent film A Dog’s Purpose (why kill off one dog when you can kill off five?). Those films are inferior examples because of the filmmakers insistence in getting every single tear out of the audience that it borders on grievous bodily harm.

Thankfully, Kirsten Tan‘s Pop Aye is on another level in comparison, as Tan provides an amiable, bittersweet and surprisingly surreal piece of work. The subtle and contemplative tone and the script by Tan makes the film more than the sum of its parts.

One of the things the film gets right is the titular character itself, Pop Aye. Named after the cartoon but renamed for copyright purposes and played by Bong and two other elephants, Pop Aye is as contemplative as he is charming. His reactions towards the many bizarre characters in the road trip are funny. But he really stand out when you see his final shot of the film, as he stares into the horizon.

pop-aye---still-3_30432622483_o-h_2017

In fact, the humour in the film is quite sharp. Whether its showing a sex toy to prove a point, seeing the interactions between Thana and Bo or the great spaghetti western-like score by Matthew James Kelly, the film is not without its levity. But overall, the film is basically a low-key character study for Thana.

Thaneth Warakulnukroh gives a great performance as the lead, as he lends the right amount of gravitas, melancholy and restrained jubilation. Penpak Sirikul (last seen in The Hangover Part II) lends a surprising amount of humanity to the role of Bo, who could have easily be seen as a materialistic person.

Other surprises come from the supporting cast, such as Yukontorn Sukkijja as Jenny, a transgender woman whom Thana meets in a nightclub. Her enigmatic presence, her brief exchanges of dialogue and her sharp wit understandably makes her a stand-out to Thana as well as the audience.

pop-aye

But the biggest surprise is Chaiwat Khumdee as Dee, a vagrant who is content with where he has ended up life. His optimism and modesty and Khumdee’s performance make Dee the best character in the film. His character also offers an opposing view in comparison to Thana, as both have cherished memories that may not be as idealized as they think.

Speaking of what is expected, there are a few surprising curveballs in the narrative that lend a lot of depth to the film, as the journey is more than just revisiting the past, but is more along the lines of sheer remorse.

The film does drag a little bit in terms of its pacing and the destination the film gets to is a bit slight compared to the journey preceding it but overall, Pop Aye is a film that stands out from the pack of human-fantasy genre trope and is worth looking out for.

Quickie Review

PROS

Great performances

Subtle storytelling and filmmaking

Narrative curveballs surprise and lend a lot of weight to the story

Beautifully shot and scored

CONS

The ending is quite slight

Slow pacing

SCORE: 7/10

lhs

This review can be also seen at THE IRIS. Visit the site by pressing the picture above.

Cast: Thaneth Warakulnukroh, Bong the elephant, Penpak Sirikul, Chaiwat Khumdee, Yukontorn Sukkijja, Narong Pongpab
Director: Kirsten Tan
Screenwriters: Kirsten Tan